NO!art + ABOUT + WIKIPEDIA + FRONT + MANIPULATION + MAIL EN | DE
Günter Brus | NO!art involvement INDEX
about Brus search


ABOUT
ARTWORKS

NO!art
occupies
the strategic
juncture where
artistic production
and socio-cultural
action meet.

STUETZPUNKT
FOUNDATION

NO!manipulation

 
Portrait Günter Brus, Photo: Dietmar Kirves

GÜNTER BRUS, born in 1939, Austria. Member of the "Wiener Aktionismus". Started with action-paintings in 1961. Since 1971 he has created many drawings in connection with self-critical texts, sometimes as books. Lives in Graz, Austria. wikipedia

2018  FLASHES OF THE FUTURE | Ludwig Forum, Aachen/Germany
2003  NO!art IN BUCHENWALD
           Boris Lurie: Geschriebigtes/Gedichtigtes, catalog book, contributions
           BORIS LURIE und die SEXISTENZ
           BORIS LURIE FESTIVAL #1
           BORIS LURIE FESTIVAL #2
           BORIS LURIE FESTIVAL #3

NO!art involved Artists: ARMENTO + ARONOVICI + BAJ + BARATELLA + BECHER + BROWN + BRUNET + BRUS + CHORBADZHIEV + D'ARCANGELO + DAYEN + DE RUVO + EHM-MARKS + ERRO + FABRICIUS + FISHER + GATEWOOD + GEORGES + GERZ + GILLESPIE + GILMAN + GOLDMAN + GOLUB + GOODMAN + HALLMANN + HASS + HJULER + KAPROW + KIRVES + KUSAMA + KUZMINSKY + LEBEL + LEVITT + LONG + LST + LURIE + MASTRANGELO + MEAD + MESECK + PATTERSON + PICARD + PINCHEVSKY + RAMSAUER + RANCILLAC + ROUSSEL + SALLES + SALMON + SCHEIBNER + SCHLEINSTEIN + STAHLBERG + STUART + TAMBELLINI + TOBOCMAN + TOCHE + TSUCHIYA + VOSTELL + WALL + WOLF + WOYTASIK + ZOWNIR

NO!art has continued way beyond 1964 and also prior to 1958. The "cutting-off" date 1964, as espoused by the art historian is entirely artificial. Such cutting-off dates are common to art historians, done for cataloguing purposes, and what is more, for accreditation of monetary value in the art market. The cutting-off dates also have a devastating effect on the production of artists, who are, by those means, being convinced that what they produce after a cutting-off date is secondary in importance, and do not belong any longer to the "new times". Yet the art market hated it, for practical reasons of creating confusion about monetary value. That is the main and real reason for art historians and critics insisting on this untrue measure. - Boris Lurie, 2003.

line
© https://brus.no-art.info/_memo-en.html